<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;Pain exists to promote evolution.&#8221; ~Dr. David R. Hawkins	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://erolfox.com/pain-exists-to-promote-evolution-dr-david-r-hawkins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://erolfox.com/pain-exists-to-promote-evolution-dr-david-r-hawkins/</link>
	<description>Clarity for leaders who know there’s more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 02:31:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Erol		</title>
		<link>https://erolfox.com/pain-exists-to-promote-evolution-dr-david-r-hawkins/comment-page-1/#comment-14784</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 02:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inherentexcellence.com/blog/?p=590#comment-14784</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks Brandon! I have tried muscle testing myself. In fact, was consulting with a supplement company, and we found in further testing that the intention of the tester was as powerful as the person tested. We worked to create a self-testing system so the tester didn&#039;t influence the results. We work as a system, together. Very powerful!

My curiosity about testing is whether is is valid to test people about the consciousness of others, especially ancient or fictional characters. If someone were to test a tribesman that never heard of Jesus, would he test at 1000? If the tester hadn&#039;t heard either, how would it test? Probably weak because they wouldn&#039;t even know who we were talking about. An interesting aspect of double-blind testing of the universe.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Brandon! I have tried muscle testing myself. In fact, was consulting with a supplement company, and we found in further testing that the intention of the tester was as powerful as the person tested. We worked to create a self-testing system so the tester didn&#8217;t influence the results. We work as a system, together. Very powerful!</p>
<p>My curiosity about testing is whether is is valid to test people about the consciousness of others, especially ancient or fictional characters. If someone were to test a tribesman that never heard of Jesus, would he test at 1000? If the tester hadn&#8217;t heard either, how would it test? Probably weak because they wouldn&#8217;t even know who we were talking about. An interesting aspect of double-blind testing of the universe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brandon D.		</title>
		<link>https://erolfox.com/pain-exists-to-promote-evolution-dr-david-r-hawkins/comment-page-1/#comment-14761</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon D.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 04:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inherentexcellence.com/blog/?p=590#comment-14761</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That one can muscle test to investigate nearly everything in the universe is not just a hypothesis.  It&#039;s done everyday by professional kinesiologic practitioners, e.g., through applied kinesiology and through clinical kinesiology.  These people get remarkable results that work for their patients (e.g., physical, emotional, mental, spiritual, etc.), and they wouldn&#039;t be in business if they didn&#039;t.

To do so, it just starts with a very simple attitude, &quot;Maybe it works.  Maybe it doesn&#039;t.  I won&#039;t know the truth unless I put in a honest effort.&quot;  Like learning to ride a bike, one can simply be open to the learning process itself even though they might not already be the next Lance Armstrong.  Or, like many, that person could merely dismiss bike riding as an impracticality or impossibility and sit on the sidelines in skepticism and doubt.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That one can muscle test to investigate nearly everything in the universe is not just a hypothesis.  It&#8217;s done everyday by professional kinesiologic practitioners, e.g., through applied kinesiology and through clinical kinesiology.  These people get remarkable results that work for their patients (e.g., physical, emotional, mental, spiritual, etc.), and they wouldn&#8217;t be in business if they didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>To do so, it just starts with a very simple attitude, &#8220;Maybe it works.  Maybe it doesn&#8217;t.  I won&#8217;t know the truth unless I put in a honest effort.&#8221;  Like learning to ride a bike, one can simply be open to the learning process itself even though they might not already be the next Lance Armstrong.  Or, like many, that person could merely dismiss bike riding as an impracticality or impossibility and sit on the sidelines in skepticism and doubt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
